WHICH DO YOU PREFER?

[Hwcouple702]

So, here's our question...I was accused by some asshole of posting "faked nudes" not long ago because I had
filtered an image of Mrs Hw to make an unusable image usable. This is a perfect example. I filter images
to remove unwanted objects from an image or to make a blurry or otherwise totally unusable image usable.
This image was taken this morning in Phoenix AZ. The angle of the sun mad this an impossible image to
take from my perspective. I took the shot and decided to remove the shadow of my hand and the camera
in order to make it a fun and usable pic. Obviously AI removed the shadow as I requested and you can
still see the sun angle from the shadow of her hat...but would you prefer either not seeing this image at all,
seeing it with shadows covering the subject, or seeing it with the modifications AI makes slightly when it
is asked to do a simple task?

PS...I do NOT love AI pics represented as authentic, but I love being able to make a fun shot usable
while not altering the subject in any meaningful way...

Mr Hw

 

[Cpl4bd]

So, here's our question...I was accused by some asshole of posting "faked nudes" not long ago because I had
filtered an image of Mrs Hw to make an unusable image usable. This is a perfect example. I filter images
to remove unwanted objects from an image or to make a blurry or otherwise totally unusable image usable.
This image was taken this morning in Phoenix AZ. The angle of the sun mad this an impossible image to
take from my perspective. I took the shot and decided to remove the shadow of my hand and the camera
in order to make it a fun and usable pic. Obviously AI removed the shadow as I requested and you can
still see the sun angle from the shadow of her hat...but would you prefer either not seeing this image at all,
seeing it with shadows covering the subject, or seeing it with the modifications AI makes slightly when it
is asked to do a simple task?

PS...I do NOT love AI pics represented as authentic, but I love being able to make a fun shot usable
while not altering the subject in any meaningful way...

Mr Hw

View attachment 3215601

Sexy as fk....
Love pool pics
Here is mine

 

[naturalcucky]

You should try to position yourself so that there are no shadows. Unfortunately, the naturalness of her skin has also disappeared.

 

[Cockneyal]

The real one is always better

 

[JRobb]

Anything you post of your incredibly HOTTT wife is fine with me! There's a HUGE difference between enhancing a photo vs "manipulating" a photo. I see your example as an enhancement. The beautiful thing is now we have TWO of her instead of just one!!!

 

[86cowboy]

So, here's our question...I was accused by some asshole of posting "faked nudes" not long ago because I had
filtered an image of Mrs Hw to make an unusable image usable. This is a perfect example. I filter images
to remove unwanted objects from an image or to make a blurry or otherwise totally unusable image usable.
This image was taken this morning in Phoenix AZ. The angle of the sun mad this an impossible image to
take from my perspective. I took the shot and decided to remove the shadow of my hand and the camera
in order to make it a fun and usable pic. Obviously AI removed the shadow as I requested and you can
still see the sun angle from the shadow of her hat...but would you prefer either not seeing this image at all,
seeing it with shadows covering the subject, or seeing it with the modifications AI makes slightly when it
is asked to do a simple task?

PS...I do NOT love AI pics represented as authentic, but I love being able to make a fun shot usable
while not altering the subject in any meaningful way...

Mr Hw

View attachment 3215601

Both are fantastic pictures, and I can definitely appreciate seeing as much of her sexy body as possible.

My preference is the unedited version. Feels more natural and turns me on more. I also tend to prefer no/minimal makeup as well, so my preferences may be the exception to the rule...

Either way, thank you both for posting and sharing here. It is always a pleasure to see this gorgeous Lady, and it is my hope that you both will continue to share your adventures here.

 

[jusme]

Yeah I had something like that. I cleaned up a blurry image and someone said I had photoshopped it.

 

[Richd]

Unedited version every time

 

[Hwcouple702]

Another example...which would you rather see? Image 1 you would never see because it is entirely
unusable...image 2 is what I consider a legitimate image...just cleaned up by AI. I don't find it
"AI distasteful" nor do I consider it "fake". I would use that as an actual image...that said, small details
are altered when AI is making an "exact replica" and cleaning it up...because it's "just guessing" at what
is in the fuzzy parts of an image.

I'm truly interested in any commentary here.

As an "aside" here...if you listen to music in MP3 format...you are listening to what ones and zeros have made
out of an original master that looked like image 1. In that case, image 1 would be the complete fidelity
master tape and image 2 is about 10% of what was originally laid down on the master, but has been
compressed and filled in with what I call a "guess". That's why MP3 formatted listening sucks so
bad. I'm not a recording engineer, but there might be someone here who can explain it...I'm just
keeping it simple. Most music being heard today could be considered as fake as the image on the right
for instance... In the days before digital imaging, you NEVER saw an image printed in a magazine that
wasn't "airbrushed" or altered from the original.

One other question...which is more "fake"...fake tits or digital fake tits?

 

[Cockneyal]

What ai do you use

 

[86cowboy]

Another example...which would you rather see? Image 1 you would never see because it is entirely
unusable...image 2 is what I consider a legitimate image...just cleaned up by AI. I don't find it
"AI distasteful" nor do I consider it "fake". I would use that as an actual image...that said, small details
are altered when AI is making an "exact replica" and cleaning it up...because it's "just guessing" at what
is in the fuzzy parts of an image.

I'm truly interested in any commentary here.

As an "aside" here...if you listen to music in MP3 format...you are listening to what ones and zeros have made
out of an original master that looked like image 1. In that case, image 1 would be the complete fidelity
master tape and image 2 is about 10% of what was originally laid down on the master, but has been
compressed and filled in with what I call a "guess". That's why MP3 formatted listening sucks so
bad. I'm not a recording engineer, but there might be someone here who can explain it...I'm just
keeping it simple. Most music being heard today could be considered as fake as the image on the right
for instance... In the days before digital imaging, you NEVER saw an image printed in a magazine that
wasn't "airbrushed" or altered from the original.

One other question...which is more "fake"...fake tits or digital fake tits?

View attachment 3216502

Am going to go against what most would likely say, I honestly prefer the unedited picture that you say is unusable.

Image 2 is definitely incredible and very well done. I enjoy seeing the extra details that have been brought out and cleaned up. Not trying to take away from that at all. It's simply my personal preference.

Image 1 feels more raw and natural. Part of the beauty of life is the imperfections.

And to answer your question about fake tits, my preference is natural again. Be they digitally or surgically enhanced doesn't matter. However, my preference only matters to me. There are many reasons to have either method of enhancement done, and sometimes it is a result of a medical situation.

Ultimately it comes down to what each individual decides they like. And as long as those decisions do not harm anyone else, and no one is being forced, what difference does it really make?

If someone does not like seeing AI edited images, simply block those users who post that type of picture. There is truly no reason to make a big deal out of it.

I personally will continue to enjoy the amazing couples and ladies who are willing to open up and share what is typically a very private part of their lives.

 

[Catholic_Wife]

So, here's our question...I was accused by some asshole of posting "faked nudes" not long ago because I had
filtered an image of Mrs Hw to make an unusable image usable. This is a perfect example. I filter images
to remove unwanted objects from an image or to make a blurry or otherwise totally unusable image usable.
This image was taken this morning in Phoenix AZ. The angle of the sun mad this an impossible image to
take from my perspective. I took the shot and decided to remove the shadow of my hand and the camera
in order to make it a fun and usable pic. Obviously AI removed the shadow as I requested and you can
still see the sun angle from the shadow of her hat...but would you prefer either not seeing this image at all,
seeing it with shadows covering the subject, or seeing it with the modifications AI makes slightly when it
is asked to do a simple task?

PS...I do NOT love AI pics represented as authentic, but I love being able to make a fun shot usable
while not altering the subject in any meaningful way...

Mr Hw

View attachment 3215601

We prefer both!

Unfiltered, filtered, raw and crude, or edited and stylish...erotica is about feelings and mind working. If a certain citizen couldn't sustain a bare minimum of imagination and poetry whenever looking to a beautiful woman portrait, well, just sorry for him.

 

[JRobb]

Another example...which would you rather see? Image 1 you would never see because it is entirely
unusable...image 2 is what I consider a legitimate image...just cleaned up by AI. I don't find it
"AI distasteful" nor do I consider it "fake". I would use that as an actual image...that said, small details
are altered when AI is making an "exact replica" and cleaning it up...because it's "just guessing" at what
is in the fuzzy parts of an image.

I'm truly interested in any commentary here.

As an "aside" here...if you listen to music in MP3 format...you are listening to what ones and zeros have made
out of an original master that looked like image 1. In that case, image 1 would be the complete fidelity
master tape and image 2 is about 10% of what was originally laid down on the master, but has been
compressed and filled in with what I call a "guess". That's why MP3 formatted listening sucks so
bad. I'm not a recording engineer, but there might be someone here who can explain it...I'm just
keeping it simple. Most music being heard today could be considered as fake as the image on the right
for instance... In the days before digital imaging, you NEVER saw an image printed in a magazine that
wasn't "airbrushed" or altered from the original.

One other question...which is more "fake"...fake tits or digital fake tits?

View attachment 3216502

The second photo is better.

 

[teutas]

yes, it's totally ok to technically tweak photos a bit, we rarely do it because of laziness 😉 but, it's a growing problem that people are posting more and more fake photos and because of AI and fake videos, which is incredible for this site, I mean, after all, this is about the voluntary exchange of intimate thoughts and content from private sex lives, fake content will only ruin this place

 

[radnorjen01]

So, here's our question...I was accused by some asshole of posting "faked nudes" not long ago because I had
filtered an image of Mrs Hw to make an unusable image usable. This is a perfect example. I filter images
to remove unwanted objects from an image or to make a blurry or otherwise totally unusable image usable.
This image was taken this morning in Phoenix AZ. The angle of the sun mad this an impossible image to
take from my perspective. I took the shot and decided to remove the shadow of my hand and the camera
in order to make it a fun and usable pic. Obviously AI removed the shadow as I requested and you can
still see the sun angle from the shadow of her hat...but would you prefer either not seeing this image at all,
seeing it with shadows covering the subject, or seeing it with the modifications AI makes slightly when it
is asked to do a simple task?

PS...I do NOT love AI pics represented as authentic, but I love being able to make a fun shot usable
while not altering the subject in any meaningful way...

Mr Hw

View attachment 3215601

In my opinion it's ok to use ai to clean up an image as long as the original image is real.

 

[Polariodcouple]

We usually try and adjust brightness and remove things from background and such.Nothing wrong with tweaking a pic but if you look you can see fully AI pics a mile off. Way too clean.
Your pics are hot and a little shadow removal is not cheating xx


Film grain is another thing,I like to see it in pics ,makes it erotic and real xxx

😈