Actually the evidence can't possibly support any argument that women don't like large cocks unless all the women surveyed have actually tried larger than average cocks which is statistically unlikely. I was trying to point out that data obtained via survey isn't the same thing as being scientifically verified. For a truly scientific evaluation, you would need a pool of women selected at random who then all try standardised small, average and large penises and record their response to each. Obviously that isn't an experiment that is ethical to conduct.
In a survey you can at the very best only collect evidence on what the respondee has actual experience of. So for example if 85% of women have only ever experienced a penis (or anything else for that matter) that's falls with the average size band or say an inch either side of that (and penis size like height, IQ etc will follow a standard distribution curve), then that is all they can comment on. Given a standard distribution of penis size , the majority of women will never have experienced either a very small or very large penis unless they have themselves a very large sample size to draw on (very many sexual partners in this case). So most women in any survey who have had hopefully reasonably good sex will,express a preference for a penis size tending towards average because that will for most of the survey sample group be what they have experienced and so are able to comment on.
This is just an issue with any study based on data acquired by survey even where this is presented in the form of a scientific report. Survey data is notoriously non-objective.
As for the over importance of dick size within the 'cuck community', well of course it could be argued that the people on this site are a self selecting, deviant group (in all senses lol) in any case. Maybe this is where the 15% end up lol
